Performance of herbicides used in cotton for control of Amaranthus

Authors

  • Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Jamil Constantin Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Rubem Silvério Oliveira Júnior Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Antonio Mendes Oliveira Neto Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Hugo Almeida Dan Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Naiara Guerra Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Alessandra Constantin Francischini Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
  • Talita Mayara Campos Jumes Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v11i1.159

Keywords:

Livid amaranth, smooth pigweed, Gossypium hirsutum L., LL® cotton, RR® cotton, tank mixtures

Abstract

Some species of Amaranthus are widely distributed in cotton crops. In recent years, ineffective weed control after herbicide use of some species has been reported. The current study was installed in order to find effective alternatives to a proper management of these species. Two simultaneous experiments were carried out for each species in this study (Amaranthus lividus and Amaranthus hybridus), and in each of them, a different stage of weed development (2 to 4 and 4 to 6 leaves) was focused. Twenty two herbicide combinations were arranged in a completely randomized design with four replicates for each experiment. Treatments were composed by the single or combined application of pyrithiobac-sodium, ammonium-glufosinate, glyphosate and trifloxysulfuron-sodium at different doses. For pyrithiobac, the best weed control results for both A. lividus and hybridus were found with applications of doses ³ 28 g ha-1. Glufosinate and glyphosate presented excellent control of both Amaranthus species, despite doses or stages of application. Comparing the use of single herbicides and tank mixtures, trifloxysulfuron+pyrithiobac resulted in improved weed control only for early applications. No negative effects of Amaranthus species were observed for mixtures of glyphosate and pyrithiobac. Mixtures of pyrithiobac and glufosinate increased A. lividus and A. hybridus control levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Doutorando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM/NAPD), Av. Colombo 5790, 87020-900, Maringá, PR. Email: <guilhermebrag@gmail.com>

Jamil Constantin, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Professores do Departamento de Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Rubem Silvério Oliveira Júnior, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Professores do Departamento de Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Antonio Mendes Oliveira Neto, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Alunos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Hugo Almeida Dan, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Alunos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Naiara Guerra, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Alunos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Alessandra Constantin Francischini, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Alunos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Talita Mayara Campos Jumes, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Acadêmica do curso de Agronomia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Downloads

Published

2012-04-10