BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF GLYPHOSATE-CONTAINING HERBICIDE MIXTURES FOR PRE-PLANT BURNDOWN CONTROL OF CONYZA SPP. AND OTHER TROUBLESOME WEED SPECIES

Autores

  • Rafael Munhoz Pedroso Universidade de São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7611-6750
  • Durval Dourado Neto University of Sao Paulo
  • Roberto Costa Avila Neto
  • Ricardo Victoria Filho University of Sao Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v1i1.747

Palavras-chave:

2, 4-D, ammonium-glufosinate, herbicide resistance, horseweed, saflufenacil

Resumo

Pre-plant burndown using herbicides is a key practice in no-till cropping systems, ensuring optimal crop sowing and early-growth conditions. Glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl glycine) is a broad-spectrum, systemic herbicide commonly employed in pre-plant burndown treatments, as it allows for cheap, effective weed management. Since glyphosate-resistant weed populations are currently widespread in Brazil, at the present work glyphosate-containing tank-mixtures with either 2,4-D, flumioxazin, saflufenacil, or ammonium-glufosinate were sprayed in the field onto nutsedge (Cyperus spp.), arrowleaf sida (Sida rhombifolia L.), and glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza spp.) populations, such that novel, cost-effective control options can be determined. Trials were conducted in the 2016/2017 growing season and employed a total of 10 herbicidal treatments plus an untreated check; herbicide rates followed label recommendations. Experimental units consisted of 15 m2 plots replicated four times, arranged as complete blocks. Weed control efficacy was determined from 7 to 42 days after spraying using a 0-100% grading scale, and was later combined with actual treatment costs to evaluate economic feasibility of these treatments in an agricultural setting. Glyphosate sprayed alone effectively eliminated nutsedge and arrowleaf sida populations, scoring the lowest cost per unit of control. Nonetheless, two- or even three-way tank-mixtures were required for satisfactory (>80%) glyphosate-resistant Conyza spp. control, allowing for a weed-free environment for summer crop seeding. Despite an increase in overall costs, tank-mixing herbicides with different modes of action should not be completely disregarded, especially in a scenario where resistance is likely to develop due to the repeated use of herbicides within the same mode of action combined with the lack of new herbicidal mode of action released into the market. 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Rafael Munhoz Pedroso, Universidade de São Paulo

LPV/ESALQ/USP

Durval Dourado Neto, University of Sao Paulo

Departamento de Produção Vegetal, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

Roberto Costa Avila Neto

Centro de Ciências Rurais, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Ricardo Victoria Filho, University of Sao Paulo

Departamento de Produção Vegetal, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

Publicado

2022-04-13

Edição

Seção

Manejo de plantas daninhas